No Education Cuts. Pass the Plan!
In 2022, the Commission on School Funding presented a clear, research-backed roadmap to reach optimal funding within 10 years. Commission Chair Guy Hobbs presented the update to this plan in the Education Committees last week. Even after record increases to education funding last session, Nevada trails the national average by more than $4000 per student today. That’s why we say Pass the Plan to stay on track toward optimal funding, including making a $700 per-pupil increase in each of the next two years, totaling just over $600 million for the biennium.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/429ad/429ad57db73c151bb9aa08d7aefb52471457bd36" alt="2.5.25-funding-graph1"
In a cold rebuke of the Commission’s work and efforts made during the last session, the Governor’s initial budget recommendation proposed to reduce base pupil funding. In a hearing last week, they said funding will increase by $2 per pupil. Of course, $2 won't keep up with increasing costs, especially with a 3.5% PERS increase coming in July and inflation that is once again trending up. Two bucks covers just .3% of the increase recommended by the Commission on School Funding for next fiscal year. The Governor’s office should be embarrassed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e489/7e489f2c169b8c212d330a304e02830b9a3e0300" alt="2.5.25-funding-graph2"
Another concerning aspect of the Governor’s recommended education budget is a steep $44M decrease for at-risk pupil weighted funding. At-risk funding is designed to reach Nevada’s neediest students, and while there is healthy debate over how to best accomplish this, there is no question these services are important and effective. Services provided under the Victory School model include free Pre-K, reading centers, and summer and after-school programs.
Education cuts shouldn’t even be on the table this session. The funding mechanism in SB543 (2019) requires the Governor to recommend increases to the Education Fund that mirror increases to the state general fund. This December, the Economic Forum estimated general fund revenue would increase by 5.4% over the biennium (before tax credits). One might think base pupil funding would see at least that much of an increase. Instead, the Governor used some budgeting sleight of hand, moving SB231 monies from another part of the state budget to the Education Fund. While these monies are needed to maintain educator pay at their current levels, this is not new money. The net effect of this move allowed the Governor to increase the education budget by a significantly lower rate, roughly 2.1%, far below increasing costs. While this may be legal, it certainly flies in the face of the legislative intent of SB543.
Two years ago, NSEA came to this table saying it was Time For 20. While we had issues with the one-time nature of SB231 (which was tricky to bargain and created the opportunity for the Governor’s recent “creative” budgeting), progress was made, and we were able to negotiate 20% raises in many Nevada districts. However, to continue progress on educator retention, new funds are needed. Last week we heard in the policy committees that better pay contributed to educator retention, lowering departures from 12% to 8%. Continued progress is necessary to prevent the educators who chose to stay, from leaving in a mass exodus when they record three years of service at their current pay after next school year.
First, the Legislature must reject the Governor’s cynical budgeting gimmick, which results in de facto cuts to public education. Next, we strongly encourage the Legislature to move forward with the recommendations of the Commission on School Funding. This means addressing loopholes in Nevada’s property tax system and updating the base on our sales tax. Pass the plan offered by the Commission on School Funding to reach optimal education funding in 10 years. Thank you.
Learn More
Do More
What's On Your Mind?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd32c/cd32c1f83f8f11e844969de3af4e93cadee16c0a" alt="Promo Block Priorities"